The stakes are high when it comes to choosing a lease accounting platform, because it directly affects the accuracy of your company’s financial reporting. Just about every firm working to implement the new lease accounting standards (FASB ASC 842 and IFRS 16) will be working with a new technology vendor to accomplish this project. How can you be sure you can trust what that vendor says about their own internal controls and practices, and how they will be handing your company’s financial information?
That’s exactly what Visual Lease’s SOC 1 Type 2 certification provides: proof (for both you and your independent auditors) that our internal controls are appropriately designed and properly executed to ensure safe and accurate processing of our clients’ financial transactions.
A SOC 1 report is a comprehensive assessment conducted by an independent auditor to evaluate the internal controls of a service organization that could impact the financial statements of its clients. This report focuses on the organization’s ability to maintain accurate and secure financial reporting processes and provides assurance to clients about the effectiveness of these controls.
The requirements for a SOC 1 audit vary depending on the type of report being issued. However, there are some general requirements that all SOC 1 audits must meet, including:
Your lease accounting software vendor is a service organization that acts as an extension of your own company in the sense that they perform processing of your financial data, adding lease accounting journal entries to your GL and calculating lease assets and liabilities. That’s why your technology vendor’s controls and practices need to stand up to the same level of scrutiny that your own do.
Service Organization Control (SOC) assessments and reports, created by AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) and performed and generated by an accredited audit firm, provide the assurance that a service organizations controls are properly designed to meet their stated control objectives at a specific point in time.
A SOC 1 report specifically addresses a service organization’s controls that relate to internal control of financial reporting. The Type 2 certification adds an assessment of the service organization’s execution of their own controls (whereas a Type 1 audit assesses only the design of controls). Auditors can come in at any point during or after the report’s specified time period to test and verify the service organization’s compliance with controls.
Because a SOC 1 Type 2 report covers a specific time period, it’s important to look for continuity of coverage over time. Chances are you will rely on your lease accounting technology for many years to come, so your auditors need to be satisfied that your chosen vendor continues to follow their stated controls and practices for the long term.
Visual Lease’s SOC 1 Type 2 certification services as assurance that your data is secure in our system and your lease accounting calculations are accurate.
Every SOC 1 audit is not the same; service organizations can have differences in their stated objectives and controls.
Visual Lease’s SOC 1 Type 2 audit covered data security, acceptable use of data, physical security of our offices, backup and recovery, and continuity planning. Our audit also went above and beyond policies and business practices to validate the most critical aspect of our service: our lease accounting calculations engine.
The following are the specific controls and business practices that auditors assessed and certified in Visual Lease’s SOC 1 Type 2 report.
How has SOC 1 Reporting Evolved Over Time?
Before, the absence of standardized reporting allowed companies to share information as they pleased, favoring insiders but leaving consumers and shareholders in the dark about internal controls and investor safeguards.
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) stepped in to standardize this process, introducing auditing standards for compliance. In 2011, these standards evolved into SSAE 16, later renamed SOC 1, effective from June 15, 2011.
SOC 1 aimed to align US reporting with international practices, introducing two key changes:
This new framework focused on reporting the service organization’s financial control internals, including risks from internal personnel and processes in the system description.
The SEC is making it known that environmental statements should be the equivalent of financial…
In the ever-evolving landscape of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting within real estate management,…
In the continuing exploration of the intersection between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting and…
Nearly two years after sharing its proposal for climate-related disclosures, the Securities Exchange Commission announced…
In the rapidly evolving landscape of real estate and lease management, the convergence of data…
Managing a complex lease portfolio across real estate and equipment in global business operations presents…